Opening bell report highlights:
A sharp drop on Monday sent Bitcoin plunging below $50k. Although it is now trading about 10% higher than its low this week, the volatility can make investors hesitant. Despite a rally in US markets, ETF investors sold off around 3k BTC. With upcoming elections, it’s worth noting that in the last two elections, Bitcoin has increased an average of 19% between August and November. Additionally, key trendlines are important to consider, with one acting as resistance and another potentially providing support slightly above the $40k mark should markets tumble.
Bitcoin
What started as ‘Black Monday’ turned greyish as US markets rallied after Asian markets saw their worst 2-day drop in history, now nearly recovered the very next day.
Bitcoin took a major hit, dropping over 20% from last week’s close to this week’s open for US market participants. Nervous investors watched as Bitcoin closed 8.3% higher after US markets opened.
Safe-haven assets are in demand amid Middle East geopolitics, UK politics, US elections, US economic data, and a Japanese Central Bank pivot.
Additionally, crypto faced major market makers dumping, Mt Gox repayments, and Bitcoin coming off $70k last week—a 30% increase from the July low after the German government sold 40k Bitcoins. To some extent, a drop was inevitable as investors took profits.
What happens next depends on perspective. From a short-term day-to-day view, many of the above issues may come into play. The volatility seen this week gives mixed results as we head into the US election 13 weeks from today (see table).
Bitcoin 3-month returns after largest downside weeks during a bull market
However, if volatility hasn’t rattled investors, the August to November outlook has historically been positive, with an 19% average return during election years (see chart).
Bitcoin August to November % change
US elections
If history teaches us anything, it’s that patterns often repeat. While the last decade has seen US Presidential candidates become more influential through social media and increased accessibility, voters historically prioritize their economic situation when casting their votes.
Five major economic crises have started or persisted into an election year. Notably, the Democrats, often associated with increased social spending, have reclaimed the presidency from Republicans in four out of five times (see table).
The exception was the 1980 election, which shares some unsettling similarities with this year’s electoral climate. The Republicans took office after voters dealt with high inflation, record high interest rates, increasing unemployment, and slowing GDP growth. Meanwhile, stock markets were trading at all-time highs.
Whether we are currently in a recession is a subject of debate, but much like then, terms like “recession” and “stagflation” are being frequently mentioned.
Regarding Bitcoin, Copper has discussed the potential of the ‘Elephant Trade,’ which would likely see the US Dollar decline in value under a Republican Oval Office, potentially benefiting the cryptocurrency (See OB#22).
This held true between 2016 and 2020 when Democrats won.
However, there’s a caveat: while this assessment considers historical trends, we must also consider the historical strength of the US Dollar during the same periods.
Although Republicans won back-to-back elections in 1980 and 1984, the strength of the Dollar Index (DXY) surged, reaching more than double its previous value before returning to the same levels when taking power from the Democrats
Such a scenario wouldn’t be favorable for Bitcoin post-election – should everything we’ve mentioned really line up and repeat itself.
US unemployment rate %
US federal funds rate %
US inflation rate %
Post 1980 elections DXY: US dollar index surges 70% between 1981-1985
Onchain
Although on-chain data reliant on heuristics isn’t always 100% accurate, it is useful for establishing trends. Long-term holders have sold over 625k Bitcoin since the beginning of the year when ETFs started trading and Bitcoin’s price peaked in March. However, this trend has reversed, and on-chain holdings attributed to long-term investors are now 25k Bitcoin above the price peak. Meanwhile, short-term holders are now holding 285k Bitcoin less compared to around the same time.
Source: Glassnode
Technical analysis
Last week, we noted that Bitcoin was approaching a significant long-term trendline. This trendline served as resistance around the $70k level and is now equidistant from another long-term support trendline. If this trendline functions as support, as it has in past years, Bitcoin’s price could potentially drop to as low as $41k. While this doesn’t guarantee a drop to that level, it underscores a crucial support line between the 2015 low and the FTX crash in 2022. In 2023, this lower trendline provided key support before a major rally.
Bitcoin ETF AUM & flows
Sources : Farside
Sources : Farside
Economic calendar
Disclaimer.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THIS COMMUNICATION IS FOR INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS, PROFESSIONAL AND SOPHISTICATED MARKET PARTICIPANT ONLY THE VALUE OF DIGITAL ASSETS MAY GO DOWN AND YOUR CAPITAL AND ASSETS MAY BE AT RISK
Copper Markets (Switzerland) AG (“Copper”) provides various digital assets services (“Crypto Asset Service”) to professional and institutional clients in accordance with the Swiss Federal Act on Financial Services (FinSa) of 15 June 2018 as amended and restated from time to time.
This material has been prepared for informational purposes only without regard to any individual investment objectives, financial situation, or means, and Copper is not soliciting any action based upon it. This material is not to be construed as a recommendation; or an offer to buy or sell; or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security, financial product, or instrument; or to participate in any particular trading strategy in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation, or trading strategy would be illegal. Certain transactions, including those in digital assets, give rise to substantial risk and are not suitable for all investors. Although this material is based upon information that Copper considers reliable, Copper does not represent that this material is accurate, current, or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Copper expressly disclaims any implied warranty for the use or the results of the use of the services with respect to their correctness, quality, accuracy, completeness, reliability, performance, timeliness, or continued availability. The fact that Copper has made the data and services available to you constitutes neither a recommendation that you enter into a particular transaction nor a representation that any product described herein is suitable or appropriate for you. Many of the products described involve significant risks, and you should not enter into any transactions unless you have fully understood all such risks and have independently determined that such transactions are appropriate for you. Any discussion of the risks contained herein with respect to any product should not be considered to be a disclosure of all risks or complete discussion of the risks which are mentioned. You should neither construe any of the material contained herein as business, financial, investment, hedging, trading, legal, regulatory, tax, or accounting advice nor make this service the primary basis for any investment decisions made by or on behalf of you, your accountants, or your managed or fiduciary accounts, and you may want to consult your business advisor, attorney, and tax and accounting advisors concerning any contemplated transactions.
Digital assets are considered very high risk, speculative investments and the value of digital assets can be extremely volatile. A sophisticated, technical knowledge may be needed to fully understand the characteristics of, and the risk associated with, particular digital assets.
While Copper is a member of the Financial Services Standard Association (VQF), a self-regulatory organization for anti-money laundering purposes (SRO) pursuant to the Swiss Federal Act on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (AMLA) of 10 October 1997 as amended and restated from time to time. Business conducted by us in connection with the Crypto Asset Service is not covered by the Swiss depositor protection scheme (Einlagensicherung) or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and you will not be eligible to refer any complaint relating to the Crypto Asset Service to the Swiss Banking Ombudsman.
It is your responsibility to comply with any rules and regulations applicable to you in your country of residence, incorporation, or registered office and/or country from which you access the Crypto Asset Service, as applicable.
Insights